After reading all three of the assigned Robert Browning poems for my class, it is clear that Browning had a liking for the use of parentheses in his poems. It seems (to me at least) that whenever it is inserted, there is a hint of sarcasm and wit that is spliced into the lines. For instance, the line from “Love Among the Ruins” in the beginning, “Was the site once of a city great and gay, / (So they say)”. Even if the parentheses weren't intended to have a criticizing tone, in today’s world we typically attach that phrase to express doubt or sneer at what comes before. Upon reading the whole poem, it seems that this perspective isn’t far off.
The speaker of the poem has some interesting introspection as he heads along the ruins of the city with anticipation at seeing his yellow-haired lover (I hope it’s not Porphyria, or else run). The way in which he describes the city’s past features and feats are not necessarily in a manner of reverence or awe. He claims the citizens believed “that glory and that shame alike, the gold / Bought and sold,” which implies that gold is not an ideal way to bring about feelings of glory and shame. In fact, when describing the landscape in the present day, he seems pleased at what nature has done: “And such plenty and perfection, see, of grass / Never was!”. Aside from the obvious words “plenty” and “perfection”, the use of the exclamation point helps to solidify that he prefers the way nature has overridden whatever came before it, however vainglorious it was (thank you Thomas Hardy for that vocabulary). This presents slight similarities to Coleridge in “Kubla Khan”, where nature always prevails over whatever humans try to do. In its simplest form, it is a pretty patch of grass that blankets over an ancient civilization as if to say “I’m here again.” In the beginning of the poem, I get the potentially far-reaching idea that the “quiet-coloured end of evening smiles” is a way of nature smiling at what it has done after the city is completely gone. Speaking of figurative language, the imagery in this poem is heavily favorable toward nature, which can give more hints at the speaker’s attitude right from the first stanza.
When the speaker predicts complete silence when he reaches his lover and they embrace, I believe he is highlighting an important distinction between his situation and the ancient city. Despite being completely without words, he knows the love he shares with her is much more powerful, passionate, and meaningful than any of the loud and prideful history of the ancient city. In addition to this, the final words labelling the lives lived filled with “foolishness” and “sin” cement his attitude. The views in this poem mimic the sentiments in Romantic poems like “Ozymandias” and “On Seeing the Elgin Marbles”, in which it is clear that no amount of glorious things will last forever. Should it be a surprise that Browning was a deep admirer of the Romantic poets, especially Percy Shelley? I even struggle to believe that the speaker’s love for the girl will last forever—there is little that we know of her besides her “eager” eyes, and in a way this type of description of her reminds me of “She Walks in Beauty”.
On a side note, the silence the speaker mentions in this poem reminded me of Sonnet 13 from Sonnets from the Portuguese. Perhaps, just as Elizabeth’s silence is a way of “dauntless, voiceless fortitude”, Robert may have taken inspiration from this as to why he wanted the girl in his poem to “say nothing” when they greet. SILENCE ho.